<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Global Workspace on Matthias Gruber — Blog</title>
    <link>https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/tags/global-workspace/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Global Workspace on Matthias Gruber — Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/tags/global-workspace/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>IIT and Global Workspace Aren&#39;t Rivals — They Describe One Architecture</title>
      <link>https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/same-loop-from-both-ends/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/same-loop-from-both-ends/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-field-is-splitting-and-it-thinks-thats-progress&#34;&gt;The field is splitting, and it thinks that&amp;rsquo;s progress&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Consciousness science has a peculiar habit: the more it debates, the further apart it gets. A recent paper in &lt;em&gt;Trends in Cognitive Sciences&lt;/em&gt; by Ellia and Tsuchiya gave the pattern a name — schismogenesis. Rival theories don&amp;rsquo;t converge under pressure; they harden. Each adversarial collaboration, each round of &amp;ldquo;our theory predicts X and yours doesn&amp;rsquo;t,&amp;rdquo; produces not a winner but two camps that now define themselves partly by their opposition to each other. Meanwhile &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt; recently asked whether the field&amp;rsquo;s sudden &amp;ldquo;AI moment&amp;rdquo; — everyone wanting to know whether the models can be conscious — will mature the science or simply drown it in hype.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
