<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AI on Matthias Gruber — Blog</title>
    <link>https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/tags/ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI on Matthias Gruber — Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Can AI Be Conscious? What a Theory of Consciousness Actually Predicts</title>
      <link>https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/can-ai-be-conscious/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://matthiasgruber.com/blog/can-ai-be-conscious/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, recently said he thinks there&amp;rsquo;s a 15–20% chance Claude is conscious. The Pentagon awarded Anthropic a contract weeks later. Google has an internal &amp;ldquo;model welfare&amp;rdquo; team. The AI consciousness question has moved from philosophy seminar rooms to boardrooms and defense budgets.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And almost nobody is answering it with any precision.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s the problem: most people debating whether AI is conscious don&amp;rsquo;t have a theory of consciousness that makes testable predictions. They&amp;rsquo;re running on intuition, and intuition is what got us the Turing test — a behavioral measure that tells you nothing about experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
